<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Missing method of inserting custom date format field in Impress" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120647#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Missing method of inserting custom date format field in Impress" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120647">bug 120647</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tietze.heiko@gmail.com" title="Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>"> Heiko Tietze</a> <pre>(In reply to Izhar Firdaus from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=120647#c8">comment #8</a>) > "keep as it is" as in "WONTFIX due to keeping with PowerPoint > compatibility"?. 1. Are you aware of the post-hoc modification to inserted date/time fields? That's a WORKSFORME (you haven't stated a clear requirement). 2. Consistency is prime for usability, for sure, and maybe I'm too indulgent with development but don't we have more important issues? 3. The Writer dialog offers much more options than just modification to the Date field. Would be somewhat boring to show it alike in Impress, plus the dialog is not the epitome of beauty. My question to you was if you agree balancing all these facts. Otherwise we clarify the needed changes and keep the ticket open.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>