<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - ODF filter: <table:table> as child of <draw:custom-shape> is written in case of strict ODF1.2, but invalid"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102256#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - ODF filter: <table:table> as child of <draw:custom-shape> is written in case of strict ODF1.2, but invalid"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102256">bug 102256</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:rb.henschel@t-online.de" title="Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de>"> <span class="fn">Regina Henschel</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Julien Nabet from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=102256#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> Reading this one, I wonder if we shouldn't add a dialog indicating that
> since we use ODF 1.2 strict, some parts of the documents won't be exported
> so a backup should be made.</span >
The export to ODF 1.2 strict is only available via Tools > Options. So I
assume, that users who switch to strict are advanced users. I think, that an
additional dialog is not necessary. There is already the text "! Not using ODF
1.2 Extended may cause information to be lost." This could be extended by a
hint to make a backup in 'extended' format. And perhaps a link to detailed
information about 'strict' and 'extended'.
There exists the page
<a href="https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes/List_of_LibreOffice_ODF_Extensions">https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes/List_of_LibreOffice_ODF_Extensions</a>.
But that page is currently in such a bad state, that it is not helpful for
users and not even helpful for developers. And the help
[<a href="https://help.libreoffice.org/Common/General_7">https://help.libreoffice.org/Common/General_7</a>] has only one example about a
feature, which does not exist in 'strict'. Improvement in that area would be a
different issue.
<span class="quote">> Finally, block lines 1099 to 1139 from sw/source/filter/xml/xmltble.cxx
> should be executed only if we use odf version > 1.2
> Any thoughts?</span >
Why do you think so? The <office:dde-source> element exists already in ODF 1.1.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>