<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - FontWork should be available in Navigator"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122444#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - FontWork should be available in Navigator"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122444">bug 122444</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:reikenberg@gmx.de" title="reikenberg@gmx.de">reikenberg@gmx.de</a>
</span></b>
<pre>In my opinion as an end-user,
fontwork should be named like all other objects.
It makes them usage more easily and prevents confusion,
why should the end-user think to giving the fontwork an name if he want it
selectable in the navigator. Everyone would think its a bug, no matter it has a
technicaly reason for it or not.
So if the fontwork get no name, i bet this will reported as bug again sometime.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>