<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Duplex Printing - HP Officejet Pro 8600 Plus"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60428#c40">Comment # 40</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Duplex Printing - HP Officejet Pro 8600 Plus"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60428">bug 60428</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:michael.meeks@collabora.com" title="Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@collabora.com>"> <span class="fn">Michael Meeks</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre><span class="quote">> After 5 years (reported on 2013-02-07) there is still no one willing
> to try and fix this bug.</span >
Which includes those who filed the bug - unfortunately. There have been
multiple requests to bisect this to a single commit - so we can not only find
the responsible developer easily, but also have a great handle on the problem
~instantly.
It is indeed annoying to have a long list of duplicates here; no doubt - but
until it bites either a customer of an ecosystem company, or a piques a
volunteer programmers interest its hard to see how it can get fixed. The best
approach is to find the individual patch that caused the regression - that's
bisection; no doubt someone with the relevant printer / setup can do that
reasonably easily.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>