<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [META] Writer table enhancements requests"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107707#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [META] Writer table enhancements requests"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107707">bug 107707</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> <span class="fn">Telesto</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107707#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> Telesto, why need this META if we have <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [META] Writer table bugs and enhancements"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=103100">bug 103100</a> Writer tables and (also)
> enhancements?</span >
Main reason: meta <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [META] Writer table bugs and enhancements"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=103100">bug 103100</a> quite bloated if they are all listed at once. So
differentiating between 'enhancements' and 'real' bug more for convenience. It
also gives a nice listing of the enhancement request. But that's my take on
it... Not sure what the common opinion is about the need for this meta bug.. I
probably didn't ask for permission either.. So feel free to close it, if it
improves things in one way or another.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>