<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Names of Drawing Objects can be Deleted"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Names of Drawing Objects can be Deleted"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477">bug 122477</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tietze.heiko@gmail.com" title="Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Heiko Tietze</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Harald Koester from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=122477#c9">comment #9</a>)
<span class="quote">> What about using blanks as object name...</span >
I agree with you and would strip off or block all trailing white space. But
OTOH the effort vs. benefit argument is still not on our side. Simplest
solution to make everyone happy would be to add a checkbox to the names dialog
"[ ] Hide at the Navigator" that disables the name field and makes the string
empty. I the checkbox is unchecked the input would be checked for whitespace
and zero length and, least dialog effort, automatically replaced. However, I
don't see a dev working on the Ui only as this changes nothing and is not
really challenging/interesting. And how many people acknowledge the change
beyond the highly attentional QA people?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>