<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - WRITER: Shows multiple footers and no page breaks for this file, unlike MS Word" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122823#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - WRITER: Shows multiple footers and no page breaks for this file, unlike MS Word" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122823">bug 122823</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:m_a_sridhar@yahoo.com" title="M. A. Sridhar <m_a_sridhar@yahoo.com>"> M. A. Sridhar</a> <pre>I was the one that reported this bug. I generated this document using some code that we use for document generation using template expansion. I am not fully aware of the rules around correct placement of sectPr nodes, and I got to this point by trial-and-error experiments and reverse-engineering with Word template expansions. In general, my understanding is that there should be one sectPr node before each page break (w:br type=page) node. I took the stance of "if it works with Word, it should work with Libre Writer". Please point me to any documentation I can get that clearly articulates the rules for correct placement of sectPr nodes, and I will see if I can abide by the rules. But more generally, my biggest concern is that any generated files should be openable by Word, and I have seen cases where, if I don't insert the sectPr node the way I have done, Word will not open the document. And having the ability to use LibreOffice Writer to convert to PDF is crucial to us, so for now, we have fallen back to using version 5 until this issue is resolved. If I can provide any more information or help in any way, please let me know.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>