<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [META] SVG import image filter (all modules)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88278#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [META] SVG import image filter (all modules)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88278">bug 88278</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Zak.McKracken@gmx.de" title="Zak McKracken <Zak.McKracken@gmx.de>"> Zak McKracken</a> <pre>Given the large number of outstanding issues on SVGs -- what is the chance that SVGs will at some point be fully supported, and would it not be a better solution to do as OpenOffice has done and treat SVGs as a (passive) blob like other images, and use librsvg to render, print and convert them? After all, code to do all these things already exists in other open source applications, and at least to me, this looks as if a few people were making a lot of work for themselves to replicate that functionality... Barring that, I would request that until such time as this import filter works 100%, there be a way to use librsvg to embed them passively instead.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>