<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Allow use of fields in numbered headings" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89674#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Allow use of fields in numbered headings" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89674">bug 89674</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de" title="Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>"> Ulrich Windl</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89674#c7">comment #7</a>) > If we do that users likely request the field option to be present in the > numbering dialog. And that makes a quite complex dialog even worse. Would > keep this in mind anyway. I see several components for this enhancement: 1) Be able to express the feature in the ODT format 2) Be able to create (and use) the feature with writer somehow (the numbering dialog looks like a good candidate actually) 3) Be able to enter a field name where literal input is required (either allow some meta syntax like "$var" to mean "insert the value of variable `var' (at runtime), or present a pull-down list of available variables). Depends on the level of users who may want to use that...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>