<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Mysql timestamp fields not displayed in table data entry mode with mysql jdbc-connector ConnectorJ 8.x" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119139#c19">Comment # 19</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Mysql timestamp fields not displayed in table data entry mode with mysql jdbc-connector ConnectorJ 8.x" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119139">bug 119139</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:serval2412@yahoo.fr" title="Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>"> Julien Nabet</a> <pre>Lionel: about the classname searching about "com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" on Opengrok, gives "<a href="https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?project=core&q=%22com.mysql.jdbc.Driver%22&defs=&refs=&path=&hist=&type=&si=q">https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?project=core&q=%22com.mysql.jdbc.Driver%22&defs=&refs=&path=&hist=&type=&si=q</a> Should we just replace com.mysql.jdbc.Driver by com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver (see <a href="https://dev.mysql.com/doc/connector-j/8.0/en/connector-j-api-changes.html">https://dev.mysql.com/doc/connector-j/8.0/en/connector-j-api-changes.html</a>)? If yes, what about those who have an older version of the connector? Also, should it be in a separated bugtracker?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>