<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - F11 keyboard shortcut for fullscreen rather than styles & formatting dialog" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83467#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - F11 keyboard shortcut for fullscreen rather than styles & formatting dialog" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83467">bug 83467</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>Note to self --must reread before posting... Timing is fine for the 6.2 -> 6.3 cut over, but we are another 5 years of "legacy" use of <F11> shortcut for Stylist, now as a Sidebar deck. Have the comments in the 2014-12-17 Design meeting [1]. But it is true that F11's role for Full screen has become common practice [2] -- except macOS <CMD><SHFIT>+F. And that the LO Communities comments in 2011 on Ubuntu bug 891539 [3][4] suggesting a <Ctrl>+T, to match <CMD>+T, of OSX for the Style & Formatting dialog to free up <F11> for use as Full screen toggle. But some finesse needed for the associated actions -- current use of <F11>, or <Ctrl>+T with modifiers. And we might also take a look at macOS support for using <FN>+<F11> in addition to <CMD>+<SHIFT>+F, for keyboards that support it. <Ctrl><Shift>+J shotcut assignment can stay for legacy I guess. So, I am OK with doing this, but it needs to be tested well and then documented/published as a change at the major release. =-ref-= [1] <a href="https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Meetings/2014-12-17">https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Meetings/2014-12-17</a> [2] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_keyboard_shortcuts#Window_management">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_keyboard_shortcuts#Window_management</a> [3] <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/891539">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/891539</a> [4] <a href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-ux-advise/2011-November/000521.html">https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-ux-advise/2011-November/000521.html</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>