<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Change case -> Sentence case doesn't honor selection; case of entire sentence changes (STR comment 20)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49033#c23">Comment # 23</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Change case -> Sentence case doesn't honor selection; case of entire sentence changes (STR comment 20)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49033">bug 49033</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:florisv59@gmail.com" title="Peter Roelofsen <florisv59@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Peter Roelofsen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>+1 for @Mike Kaganski
Please note that most users aren't programmers. Their logic is different than
the logic of the programmers. So the question is: Whose logic is right? I'd say
that as the product is a productivity tool, the logic of the user should take
precedence over the logic of the programmer, who may not be aware how a user
may use features of the software. Anything that reduces the usability or
efficiency of a productivity tool shouod be seen as bad, a show stopper, etc.
We're not playing a game between users and programmers, and nobody should try
to win that game by inventing some "logic" so that you can maintain the status
quo and "win". Registering a bug, issue or enhancement request is a daunting
task for many users, Please remember that.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>