<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Writer repeatedly rewrites screen during document load" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122792#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Writer repeatedly rewrites screen during document load" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122792">bug 122792</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:todventtu@suomi24.fi" title="Buovjaga <todventtu@suomi24.fi>"> Buovjaga</a> <pre>Created <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=148801" name="attach_148801" title="Example ODT sanitised, comments removed">attachment 148801</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=148801&action=edit" title="Example ODT sanitised, comments removed">[details]</a> Example ODT sanitised, comments removed Attaching a sanitised version with the comments removed. Unfortunately, profiling the performance of this will likely produce a different result than if we used the version with comments. I am currently getting a callgrind profile of the file opening. However, there are existing perf reports about large numbers of comments, such as <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILEOPEN and EDITING particular .odt with excessive lots of Comments causes heavy CPU and memory load, can crash on saving" href="show_bug.cgi?id=60418">bug 60418</a>, so I think there is sufficient data for any dev wanting to tackle these issues.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>