<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - PDF export should ask to save under a new filename if the old file is locked, instead of discarding output" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123343#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - PDF export should ask to save under a new filename if the old file is locked, instead of discarding output" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123343">bug 123343</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:dani3l.grigoras@gmail.com" title="Daniel Grigoras <dani3l.grigoras@gmail.com>"> Daniel Grigoras</a> <pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=123343#c1">comment #1</a>) > and attempt to overwrite the locked file open in another app. But that is expected behavior (what would the other app then do?). What? Are you serious? Sadly, I think you prefer closing an enhancement request rather than admit an improvement needed. Let me ask you this: why does Writer offer to open a locked file as a copy in order to allow editing of read only files, but does not offer to save a locked file under a different name?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>