<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> <span class="fn">V Stuart Foote</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Remove option to adjust icon size at the Notebookbar"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122799">bug 122799</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>vstuart.foote@utsa.edu
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Remove option to adjust icon size at the Notebookbar"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122799#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Remove option to adjust icon size at the Notebookbar"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122799">bug 122799</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> <span class="fn">V Stuart Foote</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Sorry Heiko, but you know my long standing thoughts on all facets of MUFFIN
being flexible to encourage customization (e.g. <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Sidebar: as container for toolbars, ability to add functions missing from Sidebar"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=33223">bug 33223</a>). And I'd still
insist the Notebook bar needs an API similar to that of the Sidebar (<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - Create a Sidebar UNO API"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=91806">bug 91806</a>)
so devs/power users can roll their own extensions that modify the "core" NB
flavors, either with full NB or as addition to the "core".
We already have MUFFIN specific NB enhancement <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Allow extensions to register their own button within a tab in the Notebookbar"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=101704">bug 101704</a> for inability of
stable extensions to be incorporated into the NB (<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Zotero plugin does not create its own Tab/Section in the Notebookbar"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=116532">bug 116532</a> or <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Unable to add extension buttons on groupedbar & notebookbar"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=122316">bug 122316</a>)
IMHO removing the Icon size selection from the NB as here would move us the
wrong direction--and is a misinterpretation of MUFFIN. All flavors of the NB
are flexible and dynamic--none are hard coded in src files, just the layout
parsing rules for the XML.
Yes the Icon size toggle now can cause visual glitches like <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - UI glitches directly after changing „Tools/Options.../View/Notebookbar icon size:“ (needs redraw)"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=116228">bug 116228</a> but it
is transient, and probably could be corrected (e.g. re-sync without restart).
A personal use case, I find the Icon size toggle for the NB helpful in Writer
to exactly fit two pages side by side at 100% on my 1920x1200 dpi display. With
the small icons it fits nicely, with the default larger icons it throws up the
verticle scroll.
IMHO => NAB and WF</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>