<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WORKSFORME - FORMATTING - Adapt shape Width/Height to text option not available" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114924#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WORKSFORME - FORMATTING - Adapt shape Width/Height to text option not available" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114924">bug 114924</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:olivier.hallot@documentfoundation.org" title="Olivier Hallot <olivier.hallot@documentfoundation.org>"> Olivier Hallot</a> <pre>I tested Regina's comments to see where it fits in Help. I think there is still a design issue. So there are "custom shape" and "shapes". Visually there is no difference between a rectangle and a custom rectangle at their default. Both rectables have same blue color. So in the point of view of the user, Eric's report stands. Different object have same visual result but different properties. Would you consider changing default background/line color or shape of the handles to differentiate objects underlying the same external appearance? Another question is how bad is to drop (or hide) the commands to create the legacy shapes, so from now on only custom shapes are created?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>