<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WORKSFORME - FORMATTING - Adapt shape Width/Height to text option not available"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114924#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WORKSFORME - FORMATTING - Adapt shape Width/Height to text option not available"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114924">bug 114924</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tietze.heiko@gmail.com" title="Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Heiko Tietze</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Olivier Hallot from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=114924#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> Would you consider changing default background/line color or shape of the
> handles to differentiate objects underlying the same external appearance?</span >
Admitted, the difference is not clear. Object background color could be an idea
but it is "unit tested" at so many places that we better not touch it. The
simple solution is a text in the properties dialog. Ideally we have a special
ticket for this.
<span class="quote">> Another question is how bad is to drop (or hide) the commands to create the
> legacy shapes, so from now on only custom shapes are created?</span >
There are always use cases for different features and removing one ends up in a
regression.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>