<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Erasing Master & Slave Fields in form properties does not unlink them from form."
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123639#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Erasing Master & Slave Fields in form properties does not unlink them from form."
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123639">bug 123639</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ribotb@gmail.com" title="ribotb <ribotb@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">ribotb</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Robert Großkopf from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=123639#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> The link in the form is created by you. It mustn't be the same link as the
> link in the relationships. So it wouldn't recognize if you change the
> relationship for the tables and will show the old result. If the field of
> the link in the mainform and in the subform do exist it will show the
> related data. Screenshots doesn't show an erazed link from form to subform.
>
> You have linked, in your example, "IdEdt" of the two tables. You changed the
> value for "editeur" in the table, but the link "IdEdt" is still the same:
> '0' to '0'.
>
> Could be I don't understand where you see the problem - but I can't see a
> bug. The last screenshot of the attachment shows the right result for
> linking "IdEdt".</span >
Hi,
I simply wanted to reproduce and illustrate the process described by
<a href="mailto:mmlazgar@shaw.ca">mmlazgar@shaw.ca</a>.
I agree that the relationship in the form - subform is not the relationship
traced in physical data model between tables (Tools > Relationships). And so
the fact of removing the relationship in the physical model of the data has no
effect on the relation established between the form and subform.
And I agree that there is no problem if my process is strictly identical to the
process described by <a href="mailto:mmlazgar@shaw.ca">mmlazgar@shaw.ca</a> in the bug report.
Unless I have not understood what <a href="mailto:mmlazgar@shaw.ca">mmlazgar@shaw.ca</a> was trying to describe...
Bernard</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>