<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - UI Window: LibreOffice should use macOS design language and components for drawing window frame" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83700#c17">Comment # 17</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - UI Window: LibreOffice should use macOS design language and components for drawing window frame" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83700">bug 83700</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:freedesktop.org@murb.nl" title="Maarten Brouwers <freedesktop.org@murb.nl>"> Maarten Brouwers</a> <pre>Created <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=150381" name="attach_150381" title="Proposal: move the quickactions to the application title bar (minor)">attachment 150381</a> <a href="http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=150381&action=edit" title="Proposal: move the quickactions to the application title bar (minor)">[details]</a> Proposal: move the quickactions to the application title bar (minor) Selfishly addressing: #124407, but I believe LibreOffice.org is reasonably close to getting there already. With a generic UI kit you won't get 100% native experiences. Firefox, Chrome, Spotify, even pricewinning apps like Things and iA writer, all took a different path and while not in line with mac OS guidelines they don't look ugly. Above is actually not that far away from default mac OS apps like the config tool for Audio that is shipped as a default config screen with macOS. While I agree that LibreOffice.org should look more like TextEdit and Pages I'm not sure whether LibreOffice.org would ever get there. Maybe making even bolder departures from the default GUI (like the earlier mentioned apps) have made is even better.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>