<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Report builder does not work with aliases and grouping" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124408#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Report builder does not work with aliases and grouping" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124408">bug 124408</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:drewjensen.inbox@gmail.com" title="Drew Jensen <drewjensen.inbox@gmail.com>"> Drew Jensen</a> <pre>(In reply to Robert Großkopf from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=124408#c8">comment #8</a>) > (In reply to Julien Nabet from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=124408#c7">comment #7</a>) > > 2) Reportdesign has been considered legacy since several years, could it be > > removed? > > (Goal: simplify LO code) > > Many people who use Ubuntu will get LO without Report-Builder but with the > internal legacy reports. Also many people, who use AOO and LO will use this > report-engine. So don't remove it. Seems to be a solution which generates a > report in a fast and usable way for this people. No any longer - at least not with the binaries from TDF. ReportBuilder (to create templates for the Pentaho engine) can not be removed, at least not with the installation here under Ubuntu. The legacy reports still run fine. The UI for creating/edit new legacy reports is disabled. Legacy style reports can be created by hand though and added into a Base file via a macro and they work. I would not be in favor of removing the legacy reports, quite the opposite I would like to see an extension that made them available via the GUI again.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>