<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Please change the "paragraph symbol" of "Traditional Chinese version" to "↵""
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121177#c21">Comment # 21</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Please change the "paragraph symbol" of "Traditional Chinese version" to "↵""
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121177">bug 121177</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw" title="Franklin Weng <franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw>"> <span class="fn">Franklin Weng</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=121177#c20">comment #20</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=121177#c19">comment #19</a>)
> > ... --seems the IDEOGRAPHIC NUMBER ZERO - 〇
>
> Sorry, that is the IDEOGRAPHIC NUMBER ZERO - 〇 (U+3007) from the CJK Symbols
> and Punctuation Unicode block.</span >
I don't think if there is anything "culturally appropriate" here. U+3007 has
never been used as "paragraph markings" in any CJK digital documents or editors
AFAIK.
The reporter insist using Corner Leftwards - ↵ (U+21B5) because "it is the
symbol of Enter" which applies "paragraph markings" -- kinda ridiculous to me.
So I suggest we can stop the discussion and close it as WONTFIX.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>