<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Should radio buttons be used in the java runtime selection widget" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102782#c14">Comment # 14</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Should radio buttons be used in the java runtime selection widget" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102782">bug 102782</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tietze.heiko@gmail.com" title="Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>"> Heiko Tietze</a> <pre>(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=102782#c13">comment #13</a>) > The current logic in LO's code distinguishes two different states: the user > having disabled use of Java vs. no JRE having been selected yet. Be careful > when changing the UI in a way that would conflate those two states. And that's exactly the crux with None - it sounds weird because of this implementation. No complains to find a better term but ideally we do not distinguish between "No, I don't have Java installed" and "No, I have Java but don't want to use it".</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>