<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Error in the function SUM (LibreOffice Calc)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124669#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Error in the function SUM (LibreOffice Calc)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124669">bug 124669</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:winfrieddonkers@libreoffice.org" title="Winfried Donkers <winfrieddonkers@libreoffice.org>"> <span class="fn">Winfried Donkers</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to b. from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=124669#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> two points:
>
> - it would be nice to have a warning towards the user whenever (s)he's
> dealing with files that contain deviations between formula and formerly
> stored values,
>
> - the comment 'odf spreadsheet (not saved with libreoffice)' looks outdated,
> the setting produces different evaluation of the file even after saving it
> with a different name from inside calc, thus neither 'excel' nor 'not saved
> with libreoffice' are matched ... despite that calc does! do a new
> calculation of the values with this option set, and doesn't if not set.
> someone should check under which conditions recalc is triggered, check if
> that's the intended logic, and either correct the handling of files or the
> comments in the setting dialog. </span >
You are right in your observations. Could you create two new bug reports for
each point, as each has a different cause/solution (the first is
programmatically, the second textually)?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>