<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> <span class="fn">Justin L</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN: Numbers appear in numbered list MSO created in attached DOC without visible number format"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120394">bug 120394</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Assignee</td>
<td>libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
</td>
<td>jluth@mail.com
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN: Numbers appear in numbered list MSO created in attached DOC without visible number format"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120394#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN: Numbers appear in numbered list MSO created in attached DOC without visible number format"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120394">bug 120394</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> <span class="fn">Justin L</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Timur from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=120394#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> That all really makes this DOC wrong so I set priority to low.</span >
Yes, I agree with all of that and came to the same conclusion myself. According
to Word 2003, this document is at least partially "corrupt" because if I go
into the UI for numbering on these two lines, select "customize" to see the
details, and then hit OK (without changing anything), then the numbering
appears. So there is definitely something non-standard and slightly illegal
about this document.
I also saved it to .docx format with W2003, and agree that .docx opens OK in
LO. Here we see that instead of the expected
<w:lvlText w:val="%1."/>
we get
<w:lvlText w:val=""/>
That suggests that when the numbering string is empty, it should be considered
as type NONE instead of ARABIC(1,2,3) or whatever.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>