<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> <span class="fn">V Stuart Foote</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Rename tabbed layout to notebookbar"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125009">bug 125009</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>vstuart.foote@utsa.edu
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Rename tabbed layout to notebookbar"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125009#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Rename tabbed layout to notebookbar"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125009">bug 125009</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> <span class="fn">V Stuart Foote</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Cor Nouws from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=125009#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=125009#c7">comment #7</a>)
>
> > How about "Ribbon"?
> Recognizable ánd confusing - because it's not just that.
> </span >
The "Windows Ribbon Framework" is a Microsoft marketing name [1][2] for a
Ribbon interface [3], originally marketed by Microsoft as their "Fluent UI".
While our MUFFIN Notebook Bar implements both a Ribbon (with Tab divisions),
and the equally appealing Grouped bars--we do not otherwise implement the MS
Windows Ribbon Framework--nor do we want to imply we do. We be chasing our
tail to implement missing "essentials" coming from Microsoft's flavor.
<span class="quote">> What about changing
> View > User Interface > ...
> to
> View > Default/Side/Notebook bars > ...
> (how ugly ..:\ )</span >
No, we need to keep the View -> User Interface list selection (see reasoning in
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - New UNO command that joins Toolbar Layout submenu and Notebookbar submenu"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=115131">bug 115131</a>, or <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WORKSFORME - User interface options in Options->View are hidden in PT-BR"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=108099">bug 108099</a>).
If we had to do something (and not clear we do), let's hit users in the face
with MUFFIN!
View -> User Interface
Standard Toolbars
---MUFFIN---
Single Toolbar
Sidebar
Tabbed
Groupedbar Compact
or with Experimental Features enabled
Standard Toolbars
---MUFFIN---
Single Toolbar
Sidebar
Contextual groups
Contextual Single
-------------------
Tabbed
Tabbed Compact
Groupedbar
Groupedbar Compact
or some such.
=-ref-=
[1]
<a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/windowsribbon/windowsribbon-introduction">https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/windowsribbon/windowsribbon-introduction</a>
[2] <a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/uxguide/cmd-ribbons">https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/uxguide/cmd-ribbons</a>
[3] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribbon_(computing">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribbon_(computing</a>)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>