<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Accepting the real minus as a minus sign" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125068#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Accepting the real minus as a minus sign" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125068">bug 125068</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:vstuart.foote@utsa.edu" title="V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu>"> V Stuart Foote</a> <pre>(In reply to zyklon87 from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=125068#c6">comment #6</a>) > And what means “WF”? WF: for Bugzilla bug status -> WONTFIX <a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_status">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_status</a> And IMHO this issue of typography of the Unicode 0x2212 MINUS SIGN from the Unicode Mathematical Operators BMP block, rather than our spreadsheet legacy and perfectly functional 0x002d HYPHEN-MINUS is exactly that. If you want/need the glyph for typographic formatting of Calc cells, use the format code as Regina indicates <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=125068#c2">comment 2</a> Otherwise for keyboard data input the 0x002d is suited to task, and would not be worth dev effort to support input of alternate glyphs for formula operators. Again IMHO a clear WONTFIX for this feature request.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>