<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - qt5: exported PDf file misses embedded fonts with vcl=qt5"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125234#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - qt5: exported PDf file misses embedded fonts with vcl=qt5"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125234">bug 125234</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:glogow@fbihome.de" title="Jan-Marek Glogowski <glogow@fbihome.de>"> <span class="fn">Jan-Marek Glogowski</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>So we talked about "this" on ESC today, and I'll just quote the minutes here:
* Just a reminder regarding kde5 plugin in still (Jan-Marek)
+ the qt5 plugin is currently not using cairo and it’s font handling is not
really existing.
+ if we keep kde5, should we switch qt5 to cairo too, so that people have
the same “quality”?
+ we get bug reports for qt5, even if its never automatically selected,
like
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - qt5: exported PDf file misses embedded fonts with vcl=qt5"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=125234">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125234</a>
+ Is that considered a problem for anyone or “if it hurts, don’t do it” ?
+ what do you prefer ? (Michael)
+ not sure – user has to select it themselves (Jmux)
+ happy to get bug reports, but reply to bugs is not helpful.
+ if switch to cairo automatically – has same quality / fixes
+ if this comes to still – and people non-automatically select it
+ years ago Kendy made effort to switch VCL from inside the app (Heiko)
+ at beginning of coding process – not clear that’s there.
+ easy to switch from one to the other to cope with issues.
+ talking wrt. Still – but won’t happen here (Jmux)
+ any downside to qt5 + cairo ? (Xisco)
+ not sure if there is any downside (Jmux)
+ plus is that Qt5 would be usable for users.
+ any objections to using Cairo for Qt5 ? (Michael)
+ can we make it more obvious it’s experimental? (Thorsten)
+ not accommodating random users who did odd things they found
on the net.
+ if there is a plan to improve that over time.
+ fine – how can we make this experimental ? (Jmux)
+ for help/about can write Qt5Experimental
+ had similar thing in the past for gtk3 (Miklos)
+ just ignore it unless its experimental.
+ i.e. bail out the vcl plug if not experimental mode is on
officecfg::Office::Common::Misc::ExperimentalMode::get()
+ any objections to making it experimental ?
=> will make it experimental.
So you'll still be able to use it, but have to enable experimental.
If some LxQt person is interested in some auto-loading, this can be revised to
my original suggestion.
FWIW the gtk3_kde5 plugin is "now" also forcefully linked to KIO to prevent bug
124598, even if the library just uses the file picker through an external
helper program (like Firefox does).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>