<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - The updater has never worked for me and manual updating is extremely cumbersome" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125451#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - The updater has never worked for me and manual updating is extremely cumbersome" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125451">bug 125451</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:signupemail@posteo.uk" title="signupemail@posteo.uk">signupemail@posteo.uk</a> <pre>> The original reporter is talking about the "Update check" functionality which is actually not!! an updater. It only checks if a new version is available but will never install new versions. 'Actually not an updater'; 'It only checks if a new version is available but will never install new versions'. (i) That is not what one expects from an updater. Possibly the expectation owes to Windows but the expectation exists. If this feature is retained then it seems to me that the UI should stress that it will not actually perform an update. However, so doing would throw the following further problem into relief. (ii) The current model is apt to cause frustration. > The distro builds sadly also provide more features as we still struggle with out old baseline. I do not understand. Is the idea that distro builds provide versions of Libre Office that are still experimental?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>