<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Arc is displayed as a straight line" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125547#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Arc is displayed as a straight line" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125547">bug 125547</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:rb.henschel@t-online.de" title="Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de>"> Regina Henschel</a> <pre>The default start angle for an arc is -90deg, default end value is 0deg. So if the shape wants to use a start angle of 0deg, it has to be written as direct value into the file. That is not the case, at least LibreOffice gets a "not set", when it opens the file. In case a value is not set, the default value is used. So the adjustment values tell, that an arc from -90deg to -81deg has to be drawn. The commands given in the path describe an arc from (43200|21600) to (24979|266) in a rectangle of left|top = (0|0) to right|bottom = (43200||43200). The effect of this mismatch is, that a huge width of the shape is calculated. If you zoom out, you see the complete shape. Resize it to a reasonable width and zoom back to 100%. Now you see, that the line is not straight, but that it is an arc with start angle -90deg and end angle -81deg. PowerPoint 365 initially evaluates the path and not the handles. LibreOffice regenerates the path from the handles and thus has a different result. I cannot produce such file from scratch. I suspect, that the angles have been manually set using a script. I'm not sure if it's worth the effort to include parts in the code that repair such inconsistencies within the file.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>