<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Request for new sinitic languages" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125404#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Request for new sinitic languages" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125404">bug 125404</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:erack@redhat.com" title="Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com>"> Eike Rathke</a> <pre>While 'zh' is only a macrolanguage tag, replacing the zh-CN and zh-TW language tags technically is not a good idea. Both are established in most major office programs and supporting them is necessary for interoperability, spell-checking, locale attribution and so on. Introducing other language tags to differentiate is fine, if translations differ and result in different UIs and/or different attribution. For 'cmn' vs 'zh-CN' I do not see this is the case. However, we could add cmn-CN for zh-CN and cmn-TW for zh-TW aliases. This actually makes sense in case imported document content is attributed that way to have it map to supported language tags.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>