<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Possibility to update bibliography references from bibliography database" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60232#c13">Comment # 13</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Possibility to update bibliography references from bibliography database" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60232">bug 60232</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mieszkoziemowit@gmail.com" title="Mieszko <mieszkoziemowit@gmail.com>"> Mieszko</a> <pre>Well, I'm not a heavy bibliography user - I'm writing my master thesis I do not plan to write such texts in the future. And if I really had to - I would write in LaTeX and spend some time to learn BibLaTeX rather than BibTeX due to limited options of the latter. I've had a look to Zotero and Mendeley webpages, but currently decided to insert all bibliography manually in LO, rather than learning another system and inserting info there. Such simple bibliography system in LO will be nice to people like me, but it there is no plan for base support, then it should be removed. To sum up, my end-user advice is: 1. please fix this bug (and other), polish the UX for the basic stuf (like the first Ricardo says in the first comment from <a href="https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2018/12/19/save-the-bibliography/">https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2018/12/19/save-the-bibliography/</a> There is no need for heavy rebuilding the whole stuff: advanced people will use Zotero or another plugins. 2. If there is *really* no time for simple fixes OR there is horrible spaghetti code that nobody want to touch: remove biblio</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>