<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED WORKSFORME - AdoptOpenJDK is not recognized as JRE" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125007#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED WORKSFORME - AdoptOpenJDK is not recognized as JRE" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125007">bug 125007</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:sbergman@redhat.com" title="Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>"> Stephan Bergmann</a> <pre>(In reply to Kenneth from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=125007#c7">comment #7</a>) > Confirm problem. OS and LO versions: > OpenSUSE Tumbleweed x86_64 current as of right now. > libreoffice-6.2.3.2-4.2.x86_64 [...] ...which would be a further data point, in line with <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=125007#c2">comment 2</a>, suggesting that <<a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/plugins/gitiles/core/+/273330a55d7cf457da6d7ba9829527a961c40bc0%5E%21">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/plugins/gitiles/core/+/273330a55d7cf457da6d7ba9829527a961c40bc0%5E%21</a>> "Support AdoptOpenJDK", which should have fixed this on libreoffice-6-2 towards LO 6.2.1, does not work as intended. (Which, again, "would be somewhat irrelevant as the fix for <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - LibreOffice doesn't detect JVM because of unexpected java.vendor property value" href="show_bug.cgi?id=124503">bug 124503</a> should indeed get this fixed, through a different internal approach," for LO 6.2.4.) Or, Kenneth, I completely miss what you wanted to express with <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=125007#c7">comment 7</a>.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>