<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Firebird: set the "ParameterNameSubstitution" parameter at migration time" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117589#c17">Comment # 17</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Firebird: set the "ParameterNameSubstitution" parameter at migration time" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117589">bug 117589</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:drewjensen.inbox@gmail.com" title="Drew Jensen <drewjensen.inbox@gmail.com>"> Drew Jensen</a> <pre>(In reply to Robert Großkopf from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=117589#c15">comment #15</a>) > Do we really want to set the migration from "experimental" to "non > experimental" in LO 6.3, if this bug isn't solved? > > The migration will run and we will get many feedbacks about > forms with subforms, which do not run, > queries with parameters, which do not run ... The issue is designated as major and I suppose someone could make a point of pointing out to the ESC that this should be treated as a show stopper for a release. The fix should address both this use case and the form/subform use case, at least I would expect it is a common code issue. On the other hand both situations should be really easy to fix after the fact also, it's a couple lines of basic (copy past and run once) would fix it permanently for effected files, IIRC.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>