<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - GTK3: some Elementary wrap icons are smaller than others, etc" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120065#c10">Comment # 10</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - GTK3: some Elementary wrap icons are smaller than others, etc" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120065">bug 120065</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:riz_17_oke@yahoo.co.id" title="Rizal Muttaqin <riz_17_oke@yahoo.co.id>"> Rizal Muttaqin</a> <pre>(In reply to Caolán McNamara from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=120065#c6">comment #6</a>) > Looks an improvement to me. Though in the wrap page of format->image, > selecting e.g. optimal, and toggling contour on/off shows the same icon for > optimal with contour on or off. I wonder if there should be a contour > version of that icon, e.g. sw/res/wr06.png vs sw/res/wr011.png. There is > also no difference between sw/res/wr01.png (wrap NONE) and sw/res/wr07.png > (coutour wrap NONE) Yes, Galaxy use diamond to represent contour on/off. will try to set different icons as Galaxy has. As a side note TBH, I personally a little confuse with wrapping in LibO, For example wrap through the icon it self show image under text but in reality it vice versa. Could someone please see wrapping icons in Karasa Jaga theme to see if the object representation (as leaf) is not suitable?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>