<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Icon styles should not modify official application icons in start center (and other relevant places)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126074#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Icon styles should not modify official application icons in start center (and other relevant places)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126074">bug 126074</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:diazbastian@protonmail.com" title="Bastián Díaz <diazbastian@protonmail.com>"> Bastián Díaz</a> <pre>(In reply to Adolfo Jayme from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126074#c6">comment #6</a>) > > I simply refuse to drink that Kool-Aid, common among hipsters in the GNOME > community, that customizability is cancer (cf. that ridiculous “please don’t > theme our apps” letter!). Please, do not mix the themes here. First of all, I never said "no" to customization. The customization is an important part of the LibreOffice UX and for this reason there have been the styles of icons, FF themes, NotebookBar, etc. What I am questioning here is the need to ignore having a consistent visual identity through operating systems/desktop environments via visual elements such as application icons. Second, some members of the GNOME community did not say that "customization is a cancer", they support customization, but not if there is no standardized way to do it, which otherwise causes more issues than benefits, which It shows that you did not understand the meaning of the letter.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>