<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Icon styles should not modify official application icons in start center (and other relevant places)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126074#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Icon styles should not modify official application icons in start center (and other relevant places)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126074">bug 126074</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>I - again - suppose that having guidelines to icon creation when the icon is based on the official logo - is enough, vs making app icons part of the "branding". You cannot limit the amount of UI elements appearing on different marketing materials, and if any of them would then fall into that category of "we want branding", we'll end up in a miserable state of having part of UI "customized" to match environment, and other - highly prominent - parts visually different-styled, creating very unprofessional, very untidy look and feel. If we need something to represent apps in marketing papers, then better come with something very stylized and not related to icons in start center, which would represent e.g. activity, not buttons used to start the apps. This way, you decouple the icons and marketing. Still NOTABUG imo, with a possible need to have a different issue about the said app-graphics for marketing.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>