<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - PRINTING When print some signed document the paper version does not show any info about the signatures" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118945#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - PRINTING When print some signed document the paper version does not show any info about the signatures" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118945">bug 118945</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:xiscofauli@libreoffice.org" title="Xisco Faulí <xiscofauli@libreoffice.org>"> Xisco Faulí</a> <pre>(In reply to kivi from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=118945#c4">comment #4</a>) > Dear Xisco, > > I am very sorry about this decision. > Yes developers wont fix any thing, because they think they know better and > would like to do different ting instead of tings customers are asking. This > is the easiest way of life. But do not fix this do not fix that and finally > customers are not happy and to use the product is not fun or product can not > work for many people. And I am worried this way the base for the product > will shrink every day. > > The need for printed evidence that electronic document was signed REALLY IS > NEEDED especially in the communication of documents in big organisations and > government agencies. I was trying to discuss there about the LibreOffice but > they say "it can not do the job enough good" and continue to use Microsoft > Office etc... > > There people are using a lot of printed documents and need to know and need > have evidences that paper copy of the documents have been signed and the > signature is true and trusted. > This can be confirmed by the finger print which is especially prepared to be > easy to check by humans. If some one would like to check it later he/she can > check the electronic document, but people are using papers mostly. > > Sorry to say but I am disappointed that fixing and improvement of > LibreOffice is not working enough well. There are important bugs not fixed > since 5 or more years. If so maybe your decision not fix smaller bugs is > reasonable. But from my position I do not see any reason to write bugs and > make improvement suggestions if any of them are rejected or no body takes > care about them. Thousands of bugs are fixed every month. Unfortunately our resources are limited and we can't fix them all. At some point, if you need an enhancement implemented or a bug fixed, you either wait until someone does it for you ( it might take years), you do it yourself, you find someone to do it for you or you get professional support < <a href="https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/professional-support/">https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/professional-support/</a> > > > OK, you will not fix, I will not write suggestions or bug reports and > temporary the life will be fine during people in business and in government > will contijue ditch LibreOffice and will use other software even not free as > in freedom but capable of doing the job needed. > > By the way there is a lot of other software even opensource or free already > implemented this functionality and they are sure it is needed. Could you please share with us two/three software implementing this feature ? I could help us reconsidering the decision. Thanks in advance</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>