<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Sorting breaks rows data alignement when functions include columns with no data" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107779#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Sorting breaks rows data alignement when functions include columns with no data" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107779">bug 107779</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:logistikka@yahoo.com" title="Oliver Grimm <logistikka@yahoo.com>"> Oliver Grimm</a> <pre>ok, thanks, found it now B-] While I do understand the two use cases for setting or unsetting this option, I do not understand Eikes reasoning in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107779#c1">comment #1</a>. Why should a cell be left out of sorting only because if refers to something outside the selected range? When I read "[X] Update references when sorting range of cells." I assume that references should be updated after sorting all non-formula data. Nothing else. Therefore I tend to second Lucas point here: from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107779#c5">comment #5</a>: "2) arbitrary restriction of a specifically selected area" is a problem, if not bug, in my opinion. It does not affect my daily work since I do not use that option. But it needs to be solved.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>