<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - There is no way to flag/mark comments as resolved" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119228#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - There is no way to flag/mark comments as resolved" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119228">bug 119228</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:scott.clarke@codethink.co.uk" title="Scott Clarke <scott.clarke@codethink.co.uk>"> Scott Clarke</a> <pre>I've done some work on this issue using the patches submitted by Jim MacArthur a few weeks ago as a starting point. I've made changes according to the comments left on the patches. >From what I read a key issue was the use of XML_NAMESPACE_DC when XML_NAMESPACE_LO_EXT must be used (mentioned in the comments here <a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/74451/1">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/74451/1</a>). As I understand from the libreoffice docs, when extending ODF in this way using the LO_EXT namespace, it's necessary to have a suggested namespace for the added tag (see <a href="https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes#LibreOffice_ODF_extensions">https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes#LibreOffice_ODF_extensions</a>). Based on this I have modified the code so that the added flag is part of the LO_EXT namespace, whilst allowing for it to potentially become part of the DC namespace in future. I'm not sure if this is the right approach, specifically in terms of the choice of DC as the suggested namespace. Any advice on the best way of doing this would be greatly appreciated.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>