<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Crash in: Invalid signature" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126351#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Crash in: Invalid signature" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126351">bug 126351</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:demeler@gmail.com" title="demeler@gmail.com">demeler@gmail.com</a> <pre>(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126351#c2">comment #2</a>) > (In reply to Xisco Faulí from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126351#c1">comment #1</a>) > > @Jan-marek, is this related to <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Application Error with invalid SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN values" href="show_bug.cgi?id=126272">bug 126272</a> ? > > > > @demeler, what happens if you execute 'SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gen > > /opt/libreoffice6.2/program/soffice' from command line ? > > Might be. But since there is no backtrace, it's hard to tell. But Qt4 > libraries are loaded according to the raw dump. > > @demeler Please test a daily build from > <a href="https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-6-2/Linux-rpm_deb">https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-6-2/Linux-rpm_deb</a>- > x86_64@86-TDF/ with date "2019-07-11" or later (More information about daily > builds can be found at: > <a href="https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds">https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds</a>) > > There were some potential fixes merged, which might help. Yes, when I use this command, LibreOffice starts normally for 6.2.5!</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>