<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Pivot Table: rename "Page Fields" to "Filter" or "Page Fields To Filter" or…"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126496#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Pivot Table: rename "Page Fields" to "Filter" or "Page Fields To Filter" or…"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126496">bug 126496</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hi-angel@yandex.ru" title="Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>"> <span class="fn">Konstantin Kharlamov</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126496#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Konstantin Kharlamov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126496#c4">comment #4</a>)
> > In MS Office it's just "Filters"
>
> Still in favor of "Page Fields To Filter". What's you GF's opinion? She was
> the one who runs into trouble with the current label. Maybe none of the
> terms help her.</span >
She's in favor of "Filters". The "Page Fields to Filter" suggestion was mostly
my idea, driven by the fact that the discussed property of pivot tables from
POV of UNO is named as PageFields, and I assume that renaming the widget to
something without "Page Fields" would introduce discrepancy; and renaming the
property along with the widget may introduce confusion too, since UNO
tutorials/forums/docs on the internet still refer to "PageFields".</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>