<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - LibreOffice 6.3.0~rc2-1 Writer: undesirable menu changes" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126674#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - LibreOffice 6.3.0~rc2-1 Writer: undesirable menu changes" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126674">bug 126674</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:unpocomas9@gmail.com" title="John Parker <unpocomas9@gmail.com>"> John Parker</a> <pre><a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Revamp the Bullets and Numbering dialog" href="show_bug.cgi?id=120905">Bug 120905</a> was evidently initially raised for LibreOffice Impress. I cannot comment about any improvements now made to its workflow. The bug mentions usability studies. With LibreOffice Writer, the three matters I raise are regressive features. I cannot believe that a usability study was carried out in Writer after the paragraph right-context menus were redesigned and that the usability study showed the new arrangement to be best. This is a tiny part of the overall Writer user interface. But I have to use it often. It's good to know that the developers faithfully implemented the design. For me, it's a regressive design. To be sure, LibreOffice provides a means of customising menus. But don't you think that for workflows everybody uses, efficient menus should be provided by default?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>