<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - FILEOPEN DOCX Deleted non-numbered paragraph gets numbering from subsequent numbered paragraph" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125990#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - FILEOPEN DOCX Deleted non-numbered paragraph gets numbering from subsequent numbered paragraph" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125990">bug 125990</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:xiscofauli@libreoffice.org" title="Xisco Faulí <xiscofauli@libreoffice.org>"> Xisco Faulí</a> <pre>(In reply to László Németh from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=125990#c5">comment #5</a>) > @Xisco: thanks for the verification. > > > Two questions: > > 1. Should we create a unittest for it? > > I think, we need to test only the remaining format change during paragraph > joininig, ie. partial paragraph deletion. I am working on it. > > > 2. Should it be backported to 6.3 ? > > It would be fine. I don't like the idea to use the reverted FinalizeImport > workaround only in 6.3. Also I would be glad to the backport of the related > DOCX and other change tracking fixes, if it's not too late for them. It > would be a nice improvement for 6.3 (the first LibreOffice version, that is > usable for working with legal texts, ie. big amount of changing numbered > list in a mixed environment), and we could get more valuable feedback during > the timeline of our project. Hi László Németh, Would you mind backporting the needed commit to 6-3 branch in gerrit ? You know better than anyone what needs to be backported</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>