<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body><a class="email" href="mailto:plixplox@yahoo.de" title="Jens Radloff <plixplox@yahoo.de>"> Jens Radloff</a> changed <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED INVALID - oosplash: "libXinerama.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" / "error while loading shared libraries: libXinerama.so.1: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64"" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126793">bug 126793</a> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8"> <tr> <th>What</th> <th>Removed</th> <th>Added</th> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td> <td>UNCONFIRMED </td> <td>RESOLVED </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td> <td>--- </td> <td>INVALID </td> </tr></table> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED INVALID - oosplash: "libXinerama.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" / "error while loading shared libraries: libXinerama.so.1: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64"" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126793#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED INVALID - oosplash: "libXinerama.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" / "error while loading shared libraries: libXinerama.so.1: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64"" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126793">bug 126793</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:plixplox@yahoo.de" title="Jens Radloff <plixplox@yahoo.de>"> Jens Radloff</a> <pre>In fact I installed the packages of the 32-bit version of LO 6.2.5.2, which was not my intention. I detected my fault when I tried to install these packages not in Debian Stretch (Debian 9.9, oldstable), but in Debian Buster (Debian 10.0, stable). When I executed the command "dpkg -i *" in Debian Buster, I got informed that the packages I intended to install where 32 bit, while the target system is a 64 bit system. These packages could not be installed in Debian Buster. I then downloaded the archives of the amdx64 version of LO 6.2.5.2 in Debian Stretch and installed them. Trying to start swriter results in an Application Error on the console. swriter does not start. (In reply to Julien Nabet from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126793#c3">comment #3</a>) > You should use package repos instead of > trying with dpkg. > Indeed, the deb or rpm files are mainly > for those maintaining packaging or > know how to deal with dependencies. Thanks for this hint. Yes, indeed, the LO packages belonging to a certain Debian release are adapted to Debian. This can be seen if one looks at the deb file names of these packages, they seem to be special Debian versions of LO. > Also, just wonder what's the use of the machine? > Is it a production server or your personal PC? It is my personal PC. > In first case, I understand you use old stable > but don't know why you'd install an Office suite The oldstable version of Debian (Stretch) gets supported until June 2020, so it is not totally out of date yet. > in second case, I understand you want a recent LO version but don't > understand why you want to stick to stable which contain old releases. My Debian oldstable installation (Stretch) is my productive system. My Debian stable installation (Buster) is my current testing system. I noticed that LO 6.2.5.2, downloaded from the LO web site, runs successfully in Debian stable (Debian Buster). So I will upgrade my oldstable system (Stretch, my productive system) to the stable version (Buster) in order to be able to use LO 6.2.5.2, downloaded from the LO web site, in my productive system. I have put this bug reported to RESOLVED, INVALID, as suggested by Jan-Marek Glogowski.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>