<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Migration to GitLab or a similar service" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126818#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Migration to GitLab or a similar service" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126818">bug 126818</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:claudius.ellsel@live.de" title="Claudius Ellsel <claudius.ellsel@live.de>"> Claudius Ellsel</a> <pre>(In reply to Buovjaga from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126818#c6">comment #6</a>) > Over here at LibreOffice-land, we do not want to reduce the number of users > contributing to bug analysis. We can only wish they would choose the right > platform from the start (ask.libreoffice.org for questions etc), but there > is certainly not a desire to sweep issues under the rug. Good to hear. Just one thing I noticed about the wording: Bugzilla is mostly calling the actual issues "bugs" and also you are referring to it mostly for bug analysis in your comment. This might have an impact on what users think this is for. I remember that I wanted to propose a feature some years ago in a different project using Bugzilla. At first I was a bit puzzled, whether that was really the correct place for feature requests, since everything seemed to be focused on bug reports. Even in this feature request here, I had to fill in the fields for steps to reproduce and so on. This is probably also mostly on Mozillas side, but I wanted to point that out. > When freedesktop announced GitLab, I contacted Daniel Stone, who maintains > the infra and pointed him to Bugzilla 6. He was not aware of the > developments and it is possible that the infrastructural decisions would > have been different if he had known about them. That would have been indeed interesting. I am fine with the way they went and it was also not only because of the issue tracker, but also because they could have all their services in one place (which is also a thing to consider for LibreOffice as I mentioned some posts earlier). That is in my opinion a really big benefit of GitLab. So I hope the decision to stay with the current setup having Jenkins, Gerrit etc. will be overthought. This is a barrier for Newcomers and small contributions. It can also be linked to Bugzilla, if you don't like their issue tracker right now. For now I hope, the development of Bugzilla speeds up a bit to keep up with the other issue trackers from GitHub and GitLab (whose success probably also accelerated the change in some ways of thinking at Bugzilla like comment editing).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>