<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - Iteration not only bug-laden, but neglected and misunderstood"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126866#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - Iteration not only bug-laden, but neglected and misunderstood"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126866">bug 126866</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hecho@live.co.uk" title="hardcoder <hecho@live.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">hardcoder</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126866#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> asserts some "bug of attitude" - which also claims something the OP doesn't
> know about (specifically, what "team" thinks of the feature, especially
> there's no "team" in strong sense of the word, and so every contributor who</span >
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126866#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> in and corrected me, and fixed the bug. So - it isn't "misunderstood" by
> "team" (while it could be by individual contributors), and also not</span >
Of course my statements shouldn't be based on telepathy or delusion, and my
point was not about specific minds like yours. I guess I couldn't believe the
state of maturity of the feature, given all these years, and given the other
apps, so LibreOffice remains unworkable for iteration. After the initial
frustration I searched about it in more than one LibreOffice site, like I said,
and anyway it's all out there for you all to see -- what's probably missing is
someone involved that has (or gets) a different view, and sees that several
things are wrong. Every time I refer to LibreOffice team, I refer to what I've
seen on the sites. Although I'll never force you to think or speak the same way
as I did, I still think what I described as some non-computer bug has the
attributes of a bug. Of course, whether it will auto-heal in a decentralized
manner, or needs to be tracked, is a different story.
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126866#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> Here I do not declare absence of specific bugs in the feature; nor even that
> there's no flaw in its fundamental design - it's just impossible to
> understand what the flaw(s) are from this report, and so impossible to act</span >
Have you seen Kohei Yoshida's words on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Iteration causes error 522 after closing and reopening"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=33330">bug 33330</a>, comments #5 and #6? What does
it mean, "invokes an entirely different calculation engine"??? Well, why do I
care.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>