<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hecho@live.co.uk" title="hardcoder <hecho@live.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">hardcoder</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - Iteration not only bug-laden, but neglected and misunderstood"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126866">bug 126866</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Ever confirmed</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>1
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
<td>REOPENED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>INVALID
</td>
<td>---
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - Iteration not only bug-laden, but neglected and misunderstood"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126866#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - Iteration not only bug-laden, but neglected and misunderstood"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126866">bug 126866</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hecho@live.co.uk" title="hardcoder <hecho@live.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">hardcoder</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to hardcoder from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126866#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> don't quit following. While not all of those steps are necessary for
> everyone, I reckon they should be _sufficient_ for anyone to see and know
> what to do on the topic, if they are involved in maintaining LibreOffice.</span >
While reading again what I wrote I finally realized there was one more rough
edge, as I mentioned "everyone", then later only those "involved in maintaining
LibreOffice". The quoted part was a late addition, but there wasn't any
intention to compare people. I apologize again for the weird wording.
In fact, I wrote with an overall harsh tone because the original focus for me
was on software, and I didn't expect to say much about people. The developers
and maintainers can easily be wonderful people, and I won't question their
intentions. But I still challenge the maturity of the objective product they
gave, on some aspects such as Calc's iteration.
I don't understand much about Bugzilla status, but I'm throwing a REOPENED now,
as I added some more content since, just in case they haven't seen.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>