<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Redaction done right"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Redaction done right"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073">bug 127073</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:muhammet.kara@collabora.com" title="Muhammet Kara <muhammet.kara@collabora.com>"> <span class="fn">Muhammet Kara</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Ulrich Windl from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=127073#c0">comment #0</a>)
<span class="quote">> (the current implementation is basically the digital version of "print it,
> blacken it, scan it again to make a new document").</span >
That's exactly how it was designed.
(In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=127073#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> I think it's WONTFIX
>
> Muhammet, what do you think?</span >
What the reporter describes might be a nice (but risky -check the internet for
security incidents of similar implementations-) implementation of a redaction
feature, but not this one. Unless there is a strong will, and necessary
resources to implement another version of the redaction feature, this is a
WONTFIX for me.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>