<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Redaction done right"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Redaction done right"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073">bug 127073</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de" title="Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>"> <span class="fn">Ulrich Windl</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Muhammet Kara from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=127073#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> What the reporter describes might be a nice (but risky -check the internet
> for security incidents of similar implementations-) implementation of a
> redaction feature, but not this one. Unless there is a strong will, and
> necessary resources to implement another version of the redaction feature,
> this is a WONTFIX for me.</span >
Well I think another "poor man's solution" was selected for this interesting
feature. I can make an offer: Provide a simple test document, where the parts
to be redacted are marked in some color, and I'll return you a version
"redacted" with Adobe's product. Then you can look what you find in the
document, and compare it to the "pixel version". If you don't know better, you
might think things have to be that way.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>