<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Create FreeBSD version of LibreOffice"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127203#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - Create FreeBSD version of LibreOffice"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127203">bug 127203</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw" title="Franklin Weng <franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw>"> <span class="fn">Franklin Weng</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Buovjaga from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=127203#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> Some years ago we invited FreeBSD contributors to upstream patches and they
> did. We were in contact with various *BSD packagers and there was talk of
> someone setting up a Tinderbox to provide builds for *BSDs. I guess they
> were too busy to follow through.
>
> Franklin: is your proposal specifically about TDF starting to provide
> official releases for FreeBSD like is done now for Linux?</span >
A FreeBSD developer in Taiwan, who is now a staff in FreeBSD foundation,
contacted with me after COSCUP and showed their interests. I think it should
be good to have BSD-version build patch reviewed (and merged if accepted)
first, then TDF can decide if they want to official release for FreeBSD or let
FreeBSD foundation to maintain/publish.
TDF's official release may also mean more tasks for daily build, QA, ... etc.
Though my friend would do their best to help with these tasks, but I'd like to
have TDF team members to tell us how they think about it.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>